Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepatogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) as a Rescue Biliary Drainage Strategy: Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Costa Rica.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47892/rgp.2025.453.1928Keywords:
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Duodenal Obstruction, Bile DuctsAbstract
Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard treatment for biliary drainage, but it may fail in patients with advanced malignant obstruction. In such cases, endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepatogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has emerged as an effective therapeutic alternative. This retrospective study describes the experience of Hospital San Juan de Dios, Costa Rica, with EUS-HGS as a rescue drainage strategy after failed ERCP. Objective: To describe the institutional experience with EUS-HGS as a biliary drainage technique in patients with unresectable malignant obstruction and failed ERCP, evaluating its technical feasibility, clinical efficacy, and safety in a high-complexity public center. Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive patients treated with EUSHGS between April 2023 and March 2024 were included. Clinical success was defined as a ≥50% reduction in total bilirubin at 30 days. Adverse events, procedure time, and technical success were evaluated. Results: Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases (20/20). Nineteen patients (95%) reached clinical success. The mean procedure time was 18 minutes. No major complications or mortality were reported. Three patients (15%) presented mild adverse events (abdominal pain and minimal bleeding). Conclusion: EUS-HGS proved to be a safe, effective, and reproducible technique in patients with failed ERCP. The institutional experience supports its use in public centers with trained personnel, strengthening its role in the management of complex malignant biliary obstruction.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Tarantino I, Barresi L, Repici A, Traina M. EUS-guided biliary drainage: a case series. Endoscopy. 2008;40(04):336-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995455.
Sharaiha RZ, Khan MA, Kamal F, Tyberg A, Tombazzi CR, Ali B, et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(5):904-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.023.
Sharaiha RZ, Kumta NA, Desai AP, DeFilippis EM, Gabr M, Sarkisian AM, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: predictors of successful outcome in patients who fail endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(12):5500-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4913-y.
Ogura T, Higuchi K. Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasoundguided hepaticogastrostomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(15):3945-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945.
Nass KJ, Zwager LW, van der Vlugt M, Dekker E, Bossuyt PMM, Ravindran S, et al. Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;95(6):1078-1085.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.038.
Yamazaki H, Yamashita Y, Shimokawa T, Minaga K, Ogura T, Kitano M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy for malignant biliary obstruction: A meta-analysis. DEN Open. 2024;4(1):e274.
Khashab MA, Messallam AA, Penas I, Nakai Y, Modayil RJ, De la Serna C, et al. International multicenter comparative trial of transluminal EUS-guided biliary drainage via hepatogastrostomy vs. choledochoduodenostomy approaches. Endosc Int Open. 2016;04(02):E175-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-109083.
Park DH, Jang JW, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. EUSguided biliary drainage with transluminal stenting after failed ERCP: predictors of adverse events and long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(6):1276-84. doi: 10.1016/j. gie.2011.07.054.
Park DH, Lee TH, Paik WH, Choi J, Song TJ, Lee SS, et al. Feasibility and safety of a novel dedicated device for onestep EUS-guided biliary drainage: A randomized trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30(10):1461-6. doi: 10.1111/ jgh.13027.
Honjo M, Itoi T, Tsuchiya T, Tanaka R, Tonozuka R, Mukai S, et al. Safety and efficacy of ultra-tapered mechanical dilator for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy and pancreatic duct drainage compared with electrocautery dilator (with video). Endosc Ultrasound. 2018;7(6):376-82. doi: 10.4103/eus. eus_2_18.
Ogura T, Nakai Y, Iwashita T, Higuchi K, Itoi T. Novel fine gauge electrocautery dilator for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: experimental and clinical evaluation study (with video). Endosc Int Open. 2019;07(12):E1652-7. doi: 10.1055/a-0961-7890.
Amano M, Ogura T, Onda S, Takagi W, Sano T, Okuda A, et al. Prospective clinical study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using novel balloon catheter (with video). J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(3):716-20. doi: 10.1111/ jgh.13489.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Enrique Evans Rodríguez, Luis Carlos Araya Acero, Jorge Eduardo Vargas Madrigal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú by Sociedad Peruana de Gastroenterología del Perú is licensed under a Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional..
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).








2022