Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepatogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) as a Rescue Biliary Drainage Strategy: Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Costa Rica.

Authors

  • Enrique Evans Rodríguez Departamento de Gastroenterología y Endoscopia Digestiva, Hospital San Juan de Dios, Caja Costarricense del Servicio Social, San José, Merced, Costa Rica. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0472-6844
  • Luis Carlos Araya Acero Departamento de Gastroenterología y Endoscopia Digestiva, Hospital San Juan de Dios, Caja Costarricense del Servicio Social, San José, Merced, Costa Rica. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5093-780X
  • Jorge Eduardo Vargas Madrigal Departamento de Gastroenterología y Endoscopia Digestiva, Hospital San Juan de Dios, Caja Costarricense del Servicio Social, San José, Merced, Costa Rica. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9623-1389

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47892/rgp.2025.453.1928

Keywords:

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Duodenal Obstruction, Bile Ducts

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard treatment for biliary drainage, but it may fail in patients with advanced malignant obstruction. In such cases, endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepatogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) has emerged as an effective therapeutic alternative. This retrospective study describes the experience of Hospital San Juan de Dios, Costa Rica, with EUS-HGS as a rescue drainage strategy after failed ERCP. Objective: To describe the institutional experience with EUS-HGS as a biliary drainage technique in patients with unresectable malignant obstruction and failed ERCP, evaluating its technical feasibility, clinical efficacy, and safety in a high-complexity public center. Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive patients treated with EUSHGS between April 2023 and March 2024 were included. Clinical success was defined as a ≥50% reduction in total bilirubin at 30 days. Adverse events, procedure time, and technical success were evaluated. Results: Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases (20/20). Nineteen patients (95%) reached clinical success. The mean procedure time was 18 minutes. No major complications or mortality were reported. Three patients (15%) presented mild adverse events (abdominal pain and minimal bleeding). Conclusion: EUS-HGS proved to be a safe, effective, and reproducible technique in patients with failed ERCP. The institutional experience supports its use in public centers with trained personnel, strengthening its role in the management of complex malignant biliary obstruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Tarantino I, Barresi L, Repici A, Traina M. EUS-guided biliary drainage: a case series. Endoscopy. 2008;40(04):336-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995455.

Sharaiha RZ, Khan MA, Kamal F, Tyberg A, Tombazzi CR, Ali B, et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(5):904-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.023.

Sharaiha RZ, Kumta NA, Desai AP, DeFilippis EM, Gabr M, Sarkisian AM, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: predictors of successful outcome in patients who fail endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(12):5500-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4913-y.

Ogura T, Higuchi K. Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasoundguided hepaticogastrostomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(15):3945-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945.

Nass KJ, Zwager LW, van der Vlugt M, Dekker E, Bossuyt PMM, Ravindran S, et al. Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;95(6):1078-1085.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.038.

Yamazaki H, Yamashita Y, Shimokawa T, Minaga K, Ogura T, Kitano M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy for malignant biliary obstruction: A meta-analysis. DEN Open. 2024;4(1):e274.

Khashab MA, Messallam AA, Penas I, Nakai Y, Modayil RJ, De la Serna C, et al. International multicenter comparative trial of transluminal EUS-guided biliary drainage via hepatogastrostomy vs. choledochoduodenostomy approaches. Endosc Int Open. 2016;04(02):E175-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-109083.

Park DH, Jang JW, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. EUSguided biliary drainage with transluminal stenting after failed ERCP: predictors of adverse events and long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(6):1276-84. doi: 10.1016/j. gie.2011.07.054.

Park DH, Lee TH, Paik WH, Choi J, Song TJ, Lee SS, et al. Feasibility and safety of a novel dedicated device for onestep EUS-guided biliary drainage: A randomized trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30(10):1461-6. doi: 10.1111/ jgh.13027.

Honjo M, Itoi T, Tsuchiya T, Tanaka R, Tonozuka R, Mukai S, et al. Safety and efficacy of ultra-tapered mechanical dilator for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy and pancreatic duct drainage compared with electrocautery dilator (with video). Endosc Ultrasound. 2018;7(6):376-82. doi: 10.4103/eus. eus_2_18.

Ogura T, Nakai Y, Iwashita T, Higuchi K, Itoi T. Novel fine gauge electrocautery dilator for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: experimental and clinical evaluation study (with video). Endosc Int Open. 2019;07(12):E1652-7. doi: 10.1055/a-0961-7890.

Amano M, Ogura T, Onda S, Takagi W, Sano T, Okuda A, et al. Prospective clinical study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using novel balloon catheter (with video). J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(3):716-20. doi: 10.1111/ jgh.13489.

Published

09/30/2025

How to Cite

1.
Evans Rodríguez E, Araya Acero LC, Vargas Madrigal JE. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepatogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) as a Rescue Biliary Drainage Strategy: Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Costa Rica. Rev Gastroenterol Peru [nternet]. 2025 Sep. 30 [cited 2025 Dec. 5];45(3):250-4. vailable from: https://revistagastroperu.com/index.php/rgp/article/view/1928

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES