Diagnostic performance of biliopancreatic endosonography in patients with intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47892/rgp.2024.441.1648Keywords:
Endosonography, Choledocholithiasis, Diagnostic ImagingAbstract
Objective: Determine the sensitivity and specificity of the ESBP for diagnosis in patients with intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis, referred to the specialized surgical Gastroenterology center of Unión de Cirujanos SAS – Oncologists of the West Zentria group – Manizales – Colombia between March 01, 2020 to January 31, 2022. Materials and methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study in patients with intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis. The diagnostic performance of ESBP was calculated and confirmed with ERCP. Negative ESBPs were followed up by telephone. Results: 752 cases with ESBP were analyzed, of which 43.2% (n=325) were positive and 56.8% (n=427) were negative. ERCP was performed in positive cases who accepted the procedure (n=317); 73.5% (n:233) were positive for choledocholithiasis, 25.8% (n=82) tumors and 0.6% (n=2) biliary roundworms. Patients with positive ESBP underwent ERCP. S= 98.3% (95% CI: 95.7-99.5) was obtained; E= 88.1% (95% CI: 79.2-94.1); PPV = 95.8% (95% CI: 92.4-98.0); NPV = 94.9% (95% CI: 87.4-98.7). The AUC of ESBP was 0.9319 (95% CI 0.8961-0.967). Conclusion: In patients with intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis, ESBP is a useful diagnostic option in the study of pancreatic pathologies, extrahepatic biliary tree, and the identification of biliary microlithiasis; Therefore, it also allows us to complement it with a therapeutic intervention such as ERCP in a single time.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Contreras S, Domínguez Torrez LC, Valdivieso Rueda E. Luces y sombras en la predicción de coledocolitiasis: oportunida- des para la investigación futura. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol. 2021;36(4):494-500. doi: 10.22516/25007440.773.
Ángel A, Rosero G, Crispín M, Valencia J, Muñoz A, Cadavid A. Coledocolitiasis. En: Guías de Manejo en Cirugía. Bogotá: Asociación Colombiana de Cirugía; 2013.
Mitchell SE, Clark RA. A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142(4):729-33. doi: 10.2214/ajr.142.4.729.
Ko CW, Lee SP. Epidemiology and natural history of common bile duct stones and prediction of disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(6 Suppl):S165-9. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.129005.
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Sultan S, Fishman DS, Qumseya BJ, et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(6):1075-1105.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001.
Jacob JS, Lee ME, Chew EY, Thrift AP, Sealock RJ. Evaluating the Revised American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Gui- delines for Common Bile Duct Stone Diagnosis. Clin Endosc. 2021;54(2):269-274. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.100.
Meeralam Y, Al-Shammari K, Yaghoobi M. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS compared with MRCP in detecting choledocholithia- sis: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in head-to- head studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(6):986-993. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.009.
Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(8):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x.
Glomsaker T, Hoff G, Kvaløy JT, Søreide K, Aabakken L, Søreide JA, et al. Patterns and predictive factors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Br J Surg. 2013;100(3):373-80. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8992.
Jagtap N, Kumar JK, Chavan R, Basha J, Tandan M, Lakhtakia S, et al. EUS versus MRCP to perform ERCP in patients with intermediate likelihood of choledocholithiasis: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2022 Feb 10:gutjnl-2021-325080. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325080.
Sperna Weiland CJ, Verschoor EC, Poen AC, Smeets XJMN, Venneman NG, Bhalla A, et al. Suspected common bile duct stones: reduction of unnecessary ERCP by pre-procedural im- aging and timing of ERCP. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(2):1194-1202. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09615-x.
Anderloni A, Ballarè M, Pagliarulo M, Conte D, Galeazzi M, Or- sello M, et al. Prospective evaluation of early endoscopic ultra- sonography for triage in suspected choledocholithiasis: results from a large single centre series. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46(4):335- 9. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.11.007.
Patel R, Ingle M, Choksi D, Poddar P, Pandey V, Sawant P. Endo- scopic Ultrasonography Can Prevent Unnecessary Diagnostic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Even in Patients with High Likelihood of Choledocholithiasis and In- conclusive Ultrasonography: Results of a Prospective Study. Clin Endosc. 2017;50(6):592-597. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.010.
Yoo KS, Lehman GA. Endoscopic management of biliary ductal stones. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010;39(2):209-27, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2010.02.008.
Hashimoto S, Nakaoka K, Kawabe N, Kuzuya T, Funasaka K, Nagasaka M, et al. The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Gallbladder Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(10):1789. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101789.
Shea JA, Berlin JA, Escarce JJ, Clarke JR, Kinosian BP, Cabana MD, et al. Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(22):2573-81.
Tintara S, Shah I, Yakah W, Ahmed A, Sorrento CS, Kandasa- my C, et al. Evaluating the accuracy of American Society for
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis with choledocholithiasis. World J Gas- troenterol. 2022;28(16):1692-1704. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28. i16.1692.
Dahan P, Andant C, Lévy P, Amouyal P, Amouyal G, Dumont M, et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and microscopic examination of duodenal bile in the diagno- sis of cholecystolithiasis in 45 patients with normal conven- tional ultrasonography. Gut. 1996;38(2):277-81. doi: 10.1136/ gut.38.2.277.
Liu CL, Lo CM, Chan JK, Poon RT, Fan ST. EUS for detection of occult cholelithiasis in patients with idiopathic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s0016- 5107(00)70382-8.
Fujita N, Yasuda I, Endo I, Isayama H, Iwashita T, Ueki T, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithia- sis 2021. J Gastroenterol. 2023;58(9):801-833. doi: 10.1007/ s00535-023-02014-6.
Giljaca V, Gurusamy KS, Takwoingi Y, Higgie D, Poropat G, Štimac D, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic res- onance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(2):CD011549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011549.
Afzalpurkar S, Giri S, Kasturi S, Ingawale S, Sundaram S. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus en- doscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(4):2566-2573. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09744-3.
Ricardo A., Arango L. Validez diagnóstica de la endosono- grafía biliopancreática en el diagnóstico de colangitis aguda secundaria a obstrucción biliar. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol. 2017;32(3):216. doi: 10.22516/25007440.153.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lázaro Antonio Arango Molano, Andrés Sánchez Gil, Claudia Patricia Diaz Tovar, Andrés Valencia Uribe, Christian Germán Ospina Pérez, Pedro Eduardo Cuervo Pico, Rodrigo Alberto Jiménez Gómez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú by Sociedad Peruana de Gastroenterología del Perú is licensed under a Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional..
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
2022 